| 208-882-1791
Accepting
orders
8am-8pm 7
days a week Pacific Time
Home
Specials
PACK GEAR:
Pack
Saddles
Panniers
Pack
Equipment
Pack
Saddle Parts
TACK:
Saddle
Bags
Scabbards
Tack
CANVAS TENTS & MORE:
Wall
Tents
Wall
Tent Frames
Wall
Tent Stoves
Reenactors
INFORMATION:
Pack
Saddle Info Guide
Pack
Panniers Info Guide
Packing
Tips
Pictures
Hunting
Issues
Links
SHOPPING:
Gift
Certificates
Books
by George Hatley
Check
Out
Terms & Conditions
* * * * * * *
Veteran Owned Federal Contractor DUNS #: 152032343
Contact
Us by Email
support@packsaddleshop.com
* * * * * * *
Pack Saddle Shop
3071 West Twin Rd
Moscow Idaho 83843
208-882-1791
©2002-2005
Sales Tax will be collected on all items shipped to
the state of Idaho
Wall
Tent |
Boise - The Idaho Statesman Outdoor Section July
18, 2002
Experts predict impact of wolves on elk, deer
MCCALL Wolf experts told the Idaho Fish and Game
Commission on Wednesday to expect major changes in Idaho´s
elk and deer populations and hunting opportunities after wolves
become established in the state.
Commissioners heard from four wildlife experts during their regular
commission meeting.
Predictions from the scientists, three of whom have studied wolves,
ranged from serious long-term declines in elk populations to short-term
declines followed by a rebound as predator and prey populations
reach equilibrium.
However, none claimed to have the definitive answer as to what will
happen in Idaho.
There´s a lot of murky water. We do have to take it
all with a grain of salt, F&G wildlife manager Jim Hayden
from Coeur d´Alene said.
Hayden presented the commissioners with a computer model based on
existing information about how wolves affect elk.
The likely scenario would be maintaining elk herds by managing hunters
and predators other than wolves, which are protected under the Endangered
Species Act.
We have to compensate by managing those other species,
he said Adjusting populations of lions, bears and elk hunters
will allow us to compensate for wolf impacts in some units.
However, he also pointed out that predator reduction in some backcountry
units is not feasible, and hunters would be the only variable that
could realistically be managed in some areas.
Wolves were reintroduced into Idaho in 1995-96 and there are currently
about 260 of them in the state.
Scientific research done by Kyran Kunkel of the Turner Endangered
Species Fund probably most closely resembles Idaho´s situation.
In the early 1980s, wolves naturally recolonized in Northwest Montana
near Glacier National Park, and scientists started studying them
during that time.
Kunkel´s studies showed that wolves favored white-tailed deer
over elk and moose, but would shift to those animals when they were
available.
Kunkel´s work also showed that wolves and cougars co-existed
in the study area, as well as did black and grizzly bears, and all
preyed on deer, elk and moose.
After recolonization by wolves, deer and elk numbers declined and
so did hunter success. At the same time, populations of deer, elk
and hunter success improved elsewhere in Montana where there were
no wolves.
His studies showed that as prey species declined, cougars eventually
starved, wolves killed each other and had lower reproductive rates,
and the prey animals consequently rebounded and hunter success improved.
Kunkel said that cycle would likely repeat itself in the long term,
and there was probably little that could be done to change it. We
shouldn´t kid ourselves and think we can manage predator and
prey for stable populations, Kunkel said.
Dennis Murray of the University of Idaho explained that predators,
including hunters, tend to target different ages of prey. Bears
will prey on young, wolves prey on young and old, and cougars and
hunters prefer mature animals.
Murray´s finding came from a three-year study of wolf and
cougar kills during winter in eastern Idaho near Salmon. During
that period, about three-quarters of wolf and cougar kills were
elk, and about one quarter were deer.
The cumulative effect was elk herds declined in the area, but it
was also noted they were declining before the wolves were reintroduced.
Murray said the Salmon-area study was a very small snapshot
in time and space. He encouraged commissioners to aggressively
monitor elk population to try and determine what is happening to
the elk in that area, which he said is more effective than trying
to study wolves.
One scientist, Tom Bergerud from British Columbia, Canada, had more
dire predictions about wolves.
I predict that you´re going to have major impacts from
wolves in this state, he said. I predict a major elk
decline.
He said he saw wolves repeatedly depress moose, caribou and elk
populations while studying them throughout Canada, and in some cases
they wiped out local populations of caribou.
I´ve watches herd after herd (of caribou) go extinct
across Canada, he said
.
Bergerud said wolves will concentrate on one prey species until
it is depressed, then move onto another when it was available.
He also said reducing wolf numbers led to increases in prey animals,
but wolf reductions had to be done over a wide area and for long
periods of time.
As far as I´m concerned, wolves do not self regulate,
Bergerud said. I know it´s pie in the sky, but you have
to have management.
To offer story ideas or comments, contact Roger Phillips
rphillips@idahostatesman.com or 208-373-6615
Edition Date: 07-18-2002
|